The lehendakari Patxi López begins to breathe. After his interview Sunday on "Public" today has dared to "Abc Forum" and the truth is that has kept the rate, when compared to the bids keep fellow party members as or Ramon Alfredo Jauregui Pérez Rubalcaba. Speaking in front of a select group of VIPs and journalists, Lopez has made this rhetorical question: "In a democracy you can not require condition each day and it is common sense to say that democracy advances Sortu with facts and if everyone shows, starting with the judges, which breaks with ETA, rejects violence and wants to play politics with the tools of politics, then where is the problem? ".
I have no idea who has prepared the speech to Lopez, but it seems to me that whoever it was, some food and shared a dinner with Eguiguren. Otherwise, no means. The evolution of lehendakari, parallel development on the legality of judicial independence party Sortu is more than curious. A few weeks ago everything was insufficient, needed to maintain pressure. Then he grabbed the phrase that I wish it were legalized, because that would mean complying with the law, and since a few days seems a parody of itself Eguiguren, though keeping the ways and arguing that changes in the nationalist left is not its own decision, but due to the relentless anti-terrorism policy launched by the government of Rodriguez Zapatero.
But back to the question that title to the comment. The problem seems to be that the Socialist Government, instead of accepting the registration of Sortu in party registration, as would have been normal in a minimally democratic state, has put all their batteries against that possibility, mobilizing Attorney, State Bar and police forces in the search for evidence and arguments attesting to the continuity between Batasuna and Sortu. Electoral Act (LOREG), recently renovated, including the option to proceed with the banning of a party that does not meet the relevant requirements, then an automatic legalization is no nonsense, even from the point of view of the staunchest defenders the status quo.
The problem also lies in the lack of political autonomy exhibited by the English government to the daily pressure of PP, victims' associations and media to the right and extreme right. A lack of proper position, a lack of political courage, as was stated in its article in "The Country" Jesus Eguiguren , denoting the low political level of its members. It is so obviously manifest weakness of the radical right to the PP, which could even speak of ideological submission.
could go on pointing out problems, to answer the question of Lopez. For example note the lack of credibility for many Basques kept the English courts. Justice which, incidentally, has just received a correction by the Court of Strasbourg, which has disfigured the one-year sentence of imprisonment was imposed Arnaldo Otegi to assert, in his capacity as parliamentary speaker, that the English king was "the chief of the torturers." The high court finds that it violated the right to freedom of expression and the Kingdom of Spain is protected to the king above all other citizens, it does not seem to be too democratic. That is why some people do not rely on the independence of the Supreme Court when deciding whether or not Sortu legalization.
The sense of the rhetorical question of lehendakari Lopez is clear and well brought in the context of his speech to a forum complicated, such as "ABC." But it does have problems around among his peers PP and travel within his own party, call or PSOE PSE-EE. Ask about them can be the first step in trying to overcome. Courage, lehendakari.
iritziak Beste:
- Sortu in the Supreme Court - Iñaki Lasagabaster and Ramón Zallo [gara.net]
http://jbustillo.blogspot.com [Azogeak] 
0 comments:
Post a Comment