Large Clots After Vabinal Delivery

State Judicial Prejudice

The decision by the English Supreme Court not to allow Sortu independence party registration in the register of political parties is bad news for English democracy. This decision goes to show there is a bias towards anything that smacks of independence, sovereign, a breakdown of the indissoluble unity of Spain. A unit on the other hand, has been cracking for centuries, becoming an empire in a country of second division. Unit broke down because of the men who followed Simon Bolivar, José de San Martín, José Martí, José Rizal ... but we will not divert the topic today.

Prejudice affects the majority of its politicians, the media and the population that consumes them. That prejudice also affects the judiciary, but what is surprising is that despite the existence of such prejudice, high court's seven members voted in favor of Sortu registration in the registry. Not only that, but that will be submitted separate opinions to the majority opinion of the TS, still do not know.

-independence initiative in the form of statutes Sortu has finally managed to break the unanimity of the Supreme, which is an internal problem in one of the power centers of the English state, in this case the highest judicial body, because the Constitution is another matter. A lack of unanimity reflected a serious division and offering new dialectical arguments to defend Sortu.

could say that the independence left has been found with seven unexpected allies in a usually hostile territory. Seven allies that if things develop positively in the Constitutional Court, may become branded as hooligans proetarras by extreme right-wing media. And, following the delusional arguments of those sectors, based on that "if Sortu it is ETA and Batasuna Batasuna, ETA Sortu is, the seven justices, three presidents of the Chamber, would have supported the de facto legalization of ETA. To these ends

grotesque is reaching the English State in an effort to not give budge in its strategy of annihilation of the independence movement. They refuse to publicly acknowledge the reality they have in front of their noses, but privately say otherwise. Know. moreover, that sooner or later must compromise and make the leap to the new situation, but try to delay that moment, making the presentation of the nationalist left in the upcoming local and provincial elections.

A leftwing nationalist who has said for the umpteenth time that nothing and nobody is going to save his new strategy, based on the fight institucinal, ideological and mass, through peaceful and democratic. Attempting to short-term benefit of this unilateral decision is a miserable game which will give a modest dividend. If the English state was governed by political size, Sortu had been enrolled without any problems in the registry. As not, will have to drain the Constitutional way of achieving this. Incidentally, in this way can pop an unprecedented institutional crisis between the two courts, the TS and TC, all for the no capacity pusillanimous policy of a president who has not had the courage to want to go down in history as President of Peace in Euskal Herria. A president who does not happen at the height of shoes to his Republican grandfather, shot by the fascists, and that can begin to be regarded as the worst president of the English Government from the hapless times Arias Navarro.

Beste iritziak:

• can not stem the - Carlos Fonseca [elconfidencial.com]
• shorter Quarantine - Paul Rivers [paulrios.net]
• Sortu Three months, a future all - Roberto Jiménez [noticiasdenavarra.com]

http://jbustillo.blogspot.com [Azogeak]