Following on from the recent controversies generated around NaBai coalition in those that do not go into, I've read some reviews in the press that have caused me great concern. People nationalist known for his career and the inconvenience euskaltzale have argued that outside of Navarre (province) making policy decisions that may affect it. Related to Basque party take a national position on issues that, in his view, only concern Navarre (province).
Beyond the partisan bickering that is drawn on the merits of the argument, which is derived from the same is neither more nor less than the assumption of the central thesis of historical Navarre, now played by parties as UPN or CRC. The old argument that Navarre (province) has nothing to do with Euskadi, defined as CAV, the ammunition has been used since the transition to attack nationalists in Navarre Garaia thesis. I will not deny that from the ranks of nationalism and independence movement have made blunders, such as those Shouts of "Navarre Euskadi da" Aberri Eguna of the eighties in Pamplona. It is also clear that there has been pressure to Nafarroa Garaia, perhaps considering a land of promise Bizkaitarra outdated.
But those mistakes, largely overcome, can not justify in any case the adoption of theses provincials and, at bottom, separatist. The Basque national parties, whether they EAJ, EA and IA, can make decisions in Bilbao, Donibane Garazi or Tafalla. In those games militant citizens of all the Basque territories and it is wrong to identify or address the assembly of one of these games foreign territory to Navarre (province).
I trust that the occurrence is just the result of reflection of some people, that may be significant, and will not take part in the future of the doctrinal corpus of any political agent herrialde. If so, would deepen the divide in our nation artificially, Nafarroa OSOA / Euskal Herria, with the undoubted support of the parties of English and those who profess a Navarrese local. It is one thing to recognize the different legal and political frameworks that exist today in our country: BAC, CFN and Iparralde, and quite another to reinforce that division, derived from a balance of power that dates back more than thirty years and a pressure from the powers of the time. Sovereigntists forces must take into account each administrative situation and the sociology of it, but not complex, or reductionism. While government leaders joined Navarre CajaNafarroa destinations in the Canary Islands to financial institutions and Seville, to thus avoid the mere possibility of collusion with the boxes of Bizkaia, Araba and Gipuzkoa, we can not hide in a drawer strategic plans Euskal Herria deem appropriate. If they are legitimate, we must defend with equal zeal in Gernika in Tudela or Amurrio.
Anyone who has read my contributions to press and Internet in recent years knows of my fondness for a Nafarroa OSOA that brings together the entire country of the Basques. Without falling into millenarianisms or voluntarism, it is necessary that the current collective imagination of Basques do not miss the basic consideration of the country that assists us. On previous occasions I have seen fit to write against the provincialism Biscay and Gipuzkoa, which have done much harm, and are doing nation building. But those decadent provincialism can not be opposed another of the same fate, although in this case take the surname of Navarre.
Now that we are taking decisive steps in the formation of a new political scenario, overcomes inertia blocks and sterile, it's time to re-assert the centrality of Navarre in the history and future of our people. Also consider the need for that legacy content, which enter the core of political actors, and social union that opt \u200b\u200bfor sovereignty. We must proclaim that our capital is Pamplona, \u200b\u200bhistorical and current, but not as a cliché phrase to the gallery, but assuming the profound content of the concept.
The continuous improvement of communications in recent decades, both physical and virtual, have ensured that today are greater than ever, the relations between citizens of different territories. It is common for people to come to San Sebastian or Pamplona Zarautz to enjoy the sea or Donostialdea people travel to Pamplona to shop in department stores and stores in the capital of Navarre. The same is true among the other provincial capitals. When new technologies allow us instantaneous global interaction, we can not fall in interprovincial disputes without any sense. Free thought must be the full and critical attitude to the things we like, but we use arguments that do not further undermine social cohesion and national of Navarre (nation).
http://jbustillo.blogspot.com [Azogeak] 
0 comments:
Post a Comment